|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 24 post(s) |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
984
   |
Posted - 2014.03.20 17:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
IB4 Doomsdale Little proclaims that the sky is falling (again) and that this is another direct, personal attack on him by the devs. :)
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
987
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 14:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Daniel Plain wrote:TL;DR: "we're privileged fucks who cannot be arsed to tap the income sources that are bread and butter for hisec residents, yet we complain about hisec being OP".
i think you should reconsider your messaging there...
I think you should improve your understanding of the phrase "risk versus reward".
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
987
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 14:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:admiral root wrote:Daniel Plain wrote:TL;DR: "we're privileged fucks who cannot be arsed to tap the income sources that are bread and butter for hisec residents, yet we complain about hisec being OP".
i think you should reconsider your messaging there... I think you should improve your understanding of the phrase "risk versus reward". Which risk?
The inherent risk that comes with living in nullsec.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
987
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 14:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Daniel Plain wrote:i understand risk versus reward very well, thank you very much.
It didn't seem that way from your previous post.
Daniel Plain wrote:the fact of the matter is that in deep sov 0.0, mining is arguably more safe than in hisec.
And it still doesn't look that way given this post.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
989
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 17:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vhelnik Cojoin wrote:given their current direction of constant HiSec nerfs, and the company seems utterly unaware of this.
Could you list these nerfs, please?
Edit: quote fail.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
989
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 18:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
Avalokitusvara wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Its funny seeing the regular Goon posting crew being the only ones calling this a good change. Mittens must have sent a ping out this morning. Its because the Goons are the only ones benefiting from this change
I'm sure if you try really hard you can find something even more ridiculous to say.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
989
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 18:58:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:baltec1 wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:
Some folks don't do it for the isk/hr. Some folks do it to build themselves ships they buy with LP. Many folks do actually. Typically you would get enough ore to produce the ship you want by doing the missions to get the LP you need to buy the BPO. With this change you would need to do 33% more missions in order to achieve the same effect.
As a self reliant player this is an unacceptable change.
The best way to earn isk from missions is to not loot anything at all and blitz them. This change has zero impact upon the best level 4 income. Thats great if I cared about the "best isk". But I don't. If I did, I wouldn't running missions in HS and LS. I would be in 0.0 farming plexes.
Actually, no, you'd be running L4s in highsec.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
989
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 20:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
Moongoo suddenly became passive? When did that happen?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
989
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 20:14:00 -
[9] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:admiral root wrote:Moongoo suddenly became passive? When did that happen? Always has been with the exception having to push a couple buttons a couple times a week.
Ah, you're one of those experts from out of town, who's never actually done the things you talk about?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
992
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 20:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Except you can take more precautions in protecting yourself in 0.0. Where as those who mission in HS are limited to knowing that after they die concord will bounce some dudes into their pods.
You're absolutely right - there are both game mechanics and EULA provisions that prevent highsec players from paying attention to what's going on around them, watching local, setting standings, creating their own intel channels and using dscan. 
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
|
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
992
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 20:40:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:admiral root wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Except you can take more precautions in protecting yourself in 0.0. Where as those who mission in HS are limited to knowing that after they die concord will bounce some dudes into their pods. You're absolutely right - there are both game mechanics and EULA provisions that prevent highsec players from paying attention to what's going on around them, watching local, setting standings, creating their own intel channels and using dscan. If you can't secure the space you are in, then you don't deserve the space and should live in HS.
What does that have to do with the range of precautions that are available to highsec players?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
993
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 20:54:00 -
[12] - Quote
Daniel Plain wrote:i'm not sure which version of blockade you are running, but the one i run regularly has several of the same ship hull and one of them is the trigger..
Then you're not paying sufficient attention.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
995
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 21:03:00 -
[13] - Quote
Mario "flip-flop" Putz, ladies and gentlemen. *applause*
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
996
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 21:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
Opner Dresden wrote:Moon Goo is passive income
Poppycock.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
997
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 01:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
Doctor Beldrulf wrote:For those of us who went through the long process of training scrapmetal processing, and all of its prerequisites, and having gone through the standing grind for an npc corp to get some benefit out of reprocessing crappy loot, you are telling us that we wasted our time and that we should have trained something else. Thanks.
No, you trained it and got benefit from it so I don't see how you can consider that to be wasted time. You'll continue to get benefit from it, too, albeit with lesser resulting minerals. You'll still come out ahead of other people who haven't trained the skill or ground the standings as much as you.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
|
|
| |
|